A Response to Dmitry Chesnokov and the Premise of Ilya Kovalchuk’s “Respect”

Dmitry Chesnokov wrote an article today entitled “Why Ilya Kovalchuk didn’t disrespect NJ Devils in leaving for KHL.” The premise of the article is that:

1. Ilya Kovalchuk’s decision to leave the Devils’ organization was not a rash one;
2. He came back to the NHL even after he was tempted to stay in the KHL during the lockout;
3. The Devils’ organization knew about Kovalchuk’s desires well before he made the decision to leave for the NHL; and
4. Kovalchuk kept this quiet to avoid media leaks until he was sure.

Therefore, the conclusion Dmitry reaches is:

Kovalchuk will go home and play in Russia. He will almost certainly captain the National Team in Sochi. He will do what’s best for himself and his family. It is his decision. And it should be respected, especially in light of how he handled his departure, from making his feelings known months ahead of the eventual departure.

I read the article during a lunch break. It percolated in my mind. There was something right with it and something else wrong. The article properly argues its premise…while, respectfully, missing the point.

First, let’s come to reasonable definitions. Ilya Kovalchuk’s departure from the NHL has been termed a “retirement” because that is what the termination of the contract demands pursuant to the CBA.

Kovalchuk’s decision is not one of retirement.

Ilya left the NHL to play for the KHL. He has not stopped playing professional hockey. He intends to continue to do so, while making large amounts of money and paying far less taxes. It is quite feasible and even probable that Ilya Kovalchuk will net more money in his pocket as a result of his departure to the KHL than he would have had he stayed in the NHL.

The reasonable definition of retirement is the cessation of one’s chosen profession due to age, infirmity or others personal to the retiree. While labeling Ilya’s decision as a “retirement” may make it palpable in headlines and soundbites, to the unfiltered and plain-spoken among us, it is nothing of the kind.

Second, the issue of respect between Ilya Kovalchuk and the New Jersey Devils’ organization is non sequitur.

The Devils are a business, one whose primary purpose is to make money.

They sell a commodity, in this case the sport of hockey, to its consumers, known as fans.

The Devils and Ilya Kovalchuk entered into a contract, initially in violation of the NHL’s CBA and ultimately in conformity therewith.

Just as they were free to negotiate a contract and its terms within the rules in an A to B relationship, they were free to terminate that contract in the same A to B relationship, also within the rules. In other words, to the New Jersey Devils and Ilya Kovalchuk, this was in its most fundamental state an employment contract, one that happens in different forms and monetary values millions of times per day throughout the business world. Whether an employer and employee relationship is formed or terminated is not one of respect. It is one of mutual agreement, meeting of the minds, words on paper, and a set of laws that govern its application and enforcement.

In short, respect is irrelevant to this business transaction.

But this was not a transaction that only affected an A and B. There is a C that was forgotten and one whose loyalty and love demands respect.

The New Jersey Devils hockey fan.

When Ilya Kovalchuk chose New Jersey, he did so with the representation that he wanted to play for the team, before the fans, and, presumptively, to help them achieve a stated goal – to win the Stanley Cup. The irony of the fact that our own hockey team denied them that privilege only a year ago, while I write this article, is not lost on me. I reserve the right to relish those moments at their expense.

If Ilya had played the rest of his career in New Jersey and never won a Cup, that would be okay. Many fail at that stated purpose.

If he had been injured and could not continue, such is life and hockey emulates life.

Had he been traded to play elsewhere, he would have been prevented from achieving the intended result in New Jersey and that too happens every season.

If a personal tragedy had prevented him from fulfilling his contract, we would all understand.

None of these acceptable justifications applied.

He chose to leave the fans for reasons personal to him and while Dmitry calls them “complex”, they can be summed up in four words – because he wanted to.

His selfish desire to leave for monetary, family, and/or personal reasons were disrespectful to the fan base that bought season tickets and spent their time and money in support of their team.

He abandoned them.

If you take everything Ilya Kovalchuk has said on face value, he did so by placing his excuses above them….

…and the New Jersey Devils organization let him do it by signing on the dotted line.



Categories: Non-L.A. Kings News Offerings

Tags: , , , ,

8 replies

  1. Fuck him and fuck that stupid 14 year contract bullshit. How fitting that the team he spurned ended up beating his sorry ass and won the cup. Does anyone find it strange that his salary cap hit is 6.66 million and he plays for the devils? Fucking antichrist mother fucker.

  2. Nice article Bobby. While I agree his decision to leave for the KHL is an insult to the fans, at the end of the day it’s all about the monies, and I really doubt the players honestly care about the fans. It was a good business decision for him & the Devils. From what I understand, the Devils are on the hook for $250K. If he would have stayed at least two more years, that figure would be in the $1-3 million range for the entire length of his contract. For a franchise that isn’t financially strong, it’s a pretty good deal IMO… and I’m sure Lou feels the same way

  3. Way to cost your sorry asses Parise. Thank god we didn’t sign him. Its their problem. Back to our kings…

  4. None of this should surprise us. Hasn’t Kovalchuk shown multiple times that above all, he thinks only of himself!

  5. The thing is, the NHL is unique in that many teams, while supposedly “businesses,” have A. a principle goal that is NOT the norm in business because it’s not monetarily related, which is winning the Stanley Cup, and B. the normal business goal which is to make money. However, often times, to achieve A., you have to sacrifice B. Sometimes winning the Stanley Cup requires spending more money and even LOSING money, or at least RISKING the loss of money if you fail in that goal, which 29 out of 30 teams do every year.

    So that’s what’s unique about this situation. The Devils signed on the dotted line to let Kovalchuk go because they decided saving money was more important than winning the Stanley Cup. And when 2/3’s of the league’s teams don’t spend to the cap every year, they are secretly deciding the same thing, whether the fans realize it or not.

    THAT is the real story that no one writes about. We have a league where the one victory, the one means of success, is winning the Stanley Cup, and yet approximately 20 out of 30 teams every year don’t try to achieve that goal to the best of their abilities.

    We have a league that’s supposed to have parity, where every team is supposed to have a chance to win and where the players are supposed to decide who wins on the ice, and yet the majority of the teams can’t even give themselves a real chance, or give their players a real chance, because they either don’t have the money or the ambition to spend on par with the top teams. That’s the real issue here.

    • And PS, this was supposed to be the cause of the last TWO lockouts, that they were supposed to fix, and yet still we see teams forced to let players go or not sign players based on finances, despite having cap space.

  6. Kavalchuk quit. He’s a pussy. Can’t handle the NHL and wants to win a championship in an inferior league. Pussy. Get the hell outta my country ya pussy.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,048 other followers

%d bloggers like this: