I just finished writing part 1 about NHL referees Dan O’Halloren and Rob Martell’s stupidity...and now…
NHL RULE 38.4 Situations Subject to Video Review – The following situations are subject to review by the Video Goal Judge:
(i) Puck crossing the goal line.
(ii) Puck in the net prior to the goal frame being dislodged.
(iii) Puck in the net prior to, or after expiration of time at the end of the period.
(iv) Puck directed or batted into the net by a hand or foot. With the use of a foot/skate, was a distinct kicking motion evident? If so, the apparent goal must be disallowed. A DISTINCT KICKING MOTION is one which, with a pendulum motion, the player propels the puck with his skate into the net. If the Video Goal Judge determines that it was put into the net by an attacking player using a distinct kicking motion, it must be ruled NO GOAL. This would also be true even if the puck, after being kicked, deflects off any other player of either team and then into the net. This is still NO GOAL. See also 49.2.
(v) Puck deflected directly into the net off an Official.
(vi) Puck struck with a high-stick, above the height of the crossbar, by an attacking player prior to entering the goal. The determining factor is where the puck makes contact with the stick. If the puck makes contact with the stick below the level of the crossbar and enters the goal, this goal shall be allowed.
(vii) To establish the correct time on the official game clock, provided the game time is visible on the Video Goal Judge’s monitors.
(viii) The video review process shall be permitted to assist the referees in determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure they are “good hockey goals”). For example (but not limited to), pucks that enter the net by going through the net meshing, pucks that enter the net from underneath the net frame, pucks that enter the net undetected by the referee, etc.
It was reviewable. It was fucking reviewable. These monkeys in stripes could have reviewed it and didn’t know the rule.
It just leaves you speechless.
Oh and look, the NHL issued a statement:
Video of the play appears to show the puck hitting the protective mesh above the glass before deflecting off goaltender Jonathan Quick and into the Los Angeles net. While the Situation Room examined the video, this is not a reviewable play; therefore the referee’s call on the ice stands.
Really assholes? And what do you mean by “appears to show the puck hitting the protective mesh.”
If I were to take my fist and put it so far through your face that I am left holding fragments of your brain in my hand, you would not appear dead. You would be dead. Whoever was responsible for issuing this statement should have his head examined….my way.
NHL officiating incompetence has reached a new height – all at our expense.
Categories: L.A. Kings News